A bill of lading screenshot, booking number, or tracking document can look official while the cargo never moved. Before suing, organize carrier checks, forwarder records, payment trails, defendant identity, Hague service facts, and recovery targets.
Compare the B/L number, booking confirmation, vessel/voyage, container number, consignee, notify party, carrier portal, and freight-forwarder emails before relying on supplier screenshots.
Save wire records, MT103/SWIFT details, pro forma invoices, Alibaba/WeChat/WhatsApp messages, bank-account-change notices, and refund demands.
Match the exporter, factory, trading company, payment beneficiary, and Chinese legal name so the Hague service package does not name the wrong defendant.
A supplier may send a fabricated bill of lading, altered booking confirmation, recycled container number, or partial shipping screenshot to delay refund demands or induce final payment. The buyer should verify the record directly with the carrier, freight forwarder, customs broker, platform, and warehouse contacts before the trail gets stale.
Collect the alleged bill of lading, booking confirmation, commercial invoice, packing list, purchase order, payment records, bank beneficiary information, freight forwarder emails, carrier portal screenshots, container tracking history, warehouse receipts, customs entries, and every supplier message explaining shipment status.
If the false document came from a sales agent, trading company, exporter, or payment beneficiary different from the factory, the complaint and Hague service papers should align the identity evidence before translation. The same file can support expedited discovery, bank subpoenas, marketplace records, and asset-recovery strategy.
This page is general information, not legal advice. China-US litigation, supplier-dispute strategy, Hague service, judgment enforcement, and asset recovery should be reviewed against the actual documents, parties, forum, deadlines, and recovery targets.
It may support contract, fraud, or payment-recovery claims, but counsel should verify jurisdiction, contract terms, defendant identity, damages, and collectability before filing.
Preserve the supplier document exactly as received, then verify the number and shipment details with the carrier, freight forwarder, broker, warehouse, and payment records.
The party sending the document may not be the Chinese legal entity that must be served. The service package should match the correct company name, address, and supporting evidence.
For a complete strategy, compare this page with related service, supplier-dispute, and recovery resources:
It may support contract, fraud, or payment-recovery claims, but counsel should verify jurisdiction, contract terms, defendant identity, damages, and collectability before filing.
Preserve the supplier document exactly as received, then verify the number and shipment details with the carrier, freight forwarder, broker, warehouse, and payment records.
The party sending the document may not be the Chinese legal entity that must be served. The service package should match the correct company name, address, and supporting evidence.
New related guides for shipment verification and substituted-goods disputes: